<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Should you be looking at clouds?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sarquol.com/2009/11/12/looking-at-clouds/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sarquol.com/2009/11/12/looking-at-clouds/</link>
	<description>Sarquol solves messy IT problems</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Jul 2011 15:22:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ralph Bolton</title>
		<link>http://sarquol.com/2009/11/12/looking-at-clouds/#comment-13</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ralph Bolton]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 11:16:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sarquol.com/?p=394#comment-13</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The hype-cycle illustration is interesting. The disillusionment will come when we start to flesh out some of the details of cloud technology. As a general rule, a cloud infrastructure will take care of low-level non-functional requirements, such as redundancy and performance, but in no implementation I&#039;ve seen really offers any form of quality of service. Further more, clouds (or more precisely, grids) aren&#039;t big-iron databases like Oracle (or even smaller ones like MySQL). As a programmer, you need to think in almost completely new ways to architect your programs to never use a table JOIN or some other constructs that are commonplace elsewhere.

The point I&#039;m trying to make is that whatever limitations a cloud or grid has have to be understood - and not just because you&#039;ve read the marketing flyers. You actually need to re-architect your application, your developers, the development/test/release process and probably your internal cross-charging models as well. That&#039;s a considerably different proposition to the overly-simplistic &quot;just stick it in the cloud and we&#039;ll save money&quot; approach that the current hype engenders.

As you say, clouds offer some fantastic opportunities. But right now, you need to do quite a bit of your own engineering to really make use of them. Unfortunately though, you&#039;ll be side-tracked by news that some big player or other has cancelled it&#039;s cloud projects because of spiralling costs, or elongated timescales, or poor returns. If you can stick it out through all of that and play your technical cards right, the rewards could be significant.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The hype-cycle illustration is interesting. The disillusionment will come when we start to flesh out some of the details of cloud technology. As a general rule, a cloud infrastructure will take care of low-level non-functional requirements, such as redundancy and performance, but in no implementation I&#8217;ve seen really offers any form of quality of service. Further more, clouds (or more precisely, grids) aren&#8217;t big-iron databases like Oracle (or even smaller ones like MySQL). As a programmer, you need to think in almost completely new ways to architect your programs to never use a table JOIN or some other constructs that are commonplace elsewhere.</p>
<p>The point I&#8217;m trying to make is that whatever limitations a cloud or grid has have to be understood &#8211; and not just because you&#8217;ve read the marketing flyers. You actually need to re-architect your application, your developers, the development/test/release process and probably your internal cross-charging models as well. That&#8217;s a considerably different proposition to the overly-simplistic &#8220;just stick it in the cloud and we&#8217;ll save money&#8221; approach that the current hype engenders.</p>
<p>As you say, clouds offer some fantastic opportunities. But right now, you need to do quite a bit of your own engineering to really make use of them. Unfortunately though, you&#8217;ll be side-tracked by news that some big player or other has cancelled it&#8217;s cloud projects because of spiralling costs, or elongated timescales, or poor returns. If you can stick it out through all of that and play your technical cards right, the rewards could be significant.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://sarquol.com/2009/11/12/looking-at-clouds/#comment-12</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[admin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 12:42:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sarquol.com/?p=394#comment-12</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yes please. Contact from Oracle users considering cloud technology would be very interesting.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes please. Contact from Oracle users considering cloud technology would be very interesting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Miller</title>
		<link>http://sarquol.com/2009/11/12/looking-at-clouds/#comment-11</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Matt Miller]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 11:23:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sarquol.com/?p=394#comment-11</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[People I met recently at Oracle User Group Conference and E-commerce Expo would be interested in this. Shall I connect you with them?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>People I met recently at Oracle User Group Conference and E-commerce Expo would be interested in this. Shall I connect you with them?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

